Washington St.
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
250  CharLee Linton SR 20:28
344  Devon Bortfeld SO 20:40
438  Morgan Willson JR 20:49
811  Emily Dwyer SR 21:21
916  Steffie Pavey JR 21:28
1,083  Katherine Dittmann FR 21:41
1,282  Anisa Allaet FR 21:54
1,431  Alexys Garcia JR 22:05
1,621  Amanda Henderson JR 22:18
2,014  Josie Brown FR 22:43
2,908  Natalie Ackerley FR 24:25
National Rank #87 of 339
West Region Rank #15 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.1%
Most Likely Finish 15th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.2%
Top 10 in Regional 11.9%
Top 20 in Regional 99.9%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating CharLee Linton Devon Bortfeld Morgan Willson Emily Dwyer Steffie Pavey Katherine Dittmann Anisa Allaet Alexys Garcia Amanda Henderson Josie Brown Natalie Ackerley
Washington Invitational 10/02 1027 20:33 20:47 20:54 21:19 21:29 21:56 21:41 21:48 22:38
D1 Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/17 976 20:25 20:38 20:48 21:24 21:24 22:02 22:21
Inland Empire Championships 10/17 21:42 22:14 24:25
Pac 12 Championships 10/30 1002 20:26 20:42 20:49 21:42 21:25 21:47 21:50 22:07 22:14 22:45
West Region Championships 11/13 979 20:32 20:37 20:50 21:05 21:48 21:16 22:17





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.1% 28.7 759 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 13.6 401 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.9 3.2 5.4 8.6 10.9 13.6 15.5 15.6 12.2 6.6 3.3 1.2 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
CharLee Linton 2.1% 133.5
Devon Bortfeld 0.1% 180.3
Morgan Willson 0.1% 202.5
Emily Dwyer 0.1% 222.5
Steffie Pavey 0.1% 243.5
Katherine Dittmann 0.1% 244.5
Anisa Allaet 0.1% 247.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
CharLee Linton 43.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.5
Devon Bortfeld 57.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4
Morgan Willson 68.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Emily Dwyer 109.8
Steffie Pavey 120.9
Katherine Dittmann 140.8
Anisa Allaet 161.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.2% 16.7% 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 5
6 0.5% 4.3% 0.0 0.4 0.0 6
7 0.8% 0.8 7
8 1.9% 1.9 8
9 3.2% 3.2 9
10 5.4% 5.4 10
11 8.6% 8.6 11
12 10.9% 10.9 12
13 13.6% 13.6 13
14 15.5% 15.5 14
15 15.6% 15.6 15
16 12.2% 12.2 16
17 6.6% 6.6 17
18 3.3% 3.3 18
19 1.2% 1.2 19
20 0.4% 0.4 20
21 0.1% 0.1 21
22 0.0% 0.0 22
23 0.0% 0.0 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.1% 0.0 0.0 99.9 0.0 0.1




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0